April 17, 2009
Posted: 2220 GMT

ATLANTA, Georgia - There's more to global consumption than meets the eye lately. Spending money for the sake of spending is out. Spending money for a cause is in.

There something in the air, a growing global social conscience. The new global consumer is a discerning one, looking for the purpose behind the brand.

Spending money doesn't bring the kind of happiness buying with a purpose does. Global trend surveys like the annual "Good Purpose Survey" find only 25 percent of the respondents say shopping makes them happy.

More and more of us would like to become consumers with a with a cause. More than 80 percent say they're willing to change shopping habits if it will help make the world a better place and 68 percent say they're willing to stick with a more expensive brand if it serves a cause.

University enrolment in the United States, the world's biggest consumer nation, is expected to decline for financial disciplines discredited by the global financial crisis, experts say. More and more of America's young want a career with a purpose. They're signing up for science and public service seeking to make a difference in the world.

This trend may also be fueled, in part, by a hunger for quality that became apparent the night that unlikely singing sensation Susan Boyle grabbed the world's attention on "Britain's Got Talent" with her heavenly voice.

It seems to me that like other forms of consumption, entertainment becomes less frivolous in times like these. Then the question is, how long will this last.

Is consumption with a cause here to stay? We'll know when the good times come back.

Posted by: ,
Filed under: Ralitsa Vassileva


Share this on:
Anne   April 17th, 2009 2244 GMT

True, so true !

Cherisa   April 18th, 2009 004 GMT

I've started buying jewelry and other items online from fair trade and nonprofit sites instead of department stores; I want to know my money is going to support the artisans and organizations they work with.

Dean Kidd   April 18th, 2009 101 GMT

In answer to your question: I don't know if she could ever handle world attention, or want to cope with her new status, but I was as awed as anyone when she began singing. She is definately a wall flower that has bloomed.

James   April 18th, 2009 108 GMT

Hi Ralitsa,
I completely agree, people seem to be much more concerned with the value of what they are buying in terms of the financial and social costs of a product. I think during this 'economic period' those who can still buy luxury items might be influenced by a sort of guilt in that they are, for example, spending $5000 on a new bag when so many people have lost their homes and jobs. At least such a poor time in the worlds economy has had one good aspect in that it has signalled a shift in the public towards a more social way of thinking.
Big fan of your reporting (and your tweeting!)

James, Nottingham England

Ted   April 18th, 2009 110 GMT

i enjoyed your post today and have to agree with you. Things are changing around the world, it will be a different world very soon. Look forward to see all the positive changes.

LISIAS ALCANTARA   April 18th, 2009 113 GMT

I grew up thinking that everything coming from the US, be it products, artists, movies among many other things, just had to be better and more correct than anything from my own country. After the past few years I woke up to a new reality. The Susan Boyle effect is here to show us that the world is not what it appears to be. It's a pleasant wake up call.

Rich   April 18th, 2009 138 GMT

I applaud this new-found desire for quality of life. When we come closer to the issues of survival, those otherwise mundane activities become more profound. Sadly I think that once the good times roll again we'll see people going back to indulgence, casting aside the joy of simple life and the happiness from seeing and experiencing quality. "tis human nature.

Sashul   April 18th, 2009 157 GMT

Oh you know what's in the air!! :)) From my point of view, "Shopoholic" came out one bit too late.. My guess is that we are all into farytales and 70% discounts right now. Maybe we are becoming healthier consumers?
Just a year ago in Moscow where I leave, I saw a $4000 bag that in Rone u can buy for $1000. My question: "I just been in this brands flagship store and it was 4 times cheaper, why so expensive" was answered in a very peculiar way: "Hon, why sell for $1000 if they'll buy for $4000?!"
All the best for those who buy it, but maybe in these times when we are into farytales and Susan Boyle, priority in spending will be not given to $4000 bags, but to charities and all the sentimental things that for better or worse we seem to think about nowadays.

francis   April 18th, 2009 650 GMT

How do the numbers actually shake out on this? Seems to me that the "trend" may be more aspirational than not.

Jack Flannigan   April 18th, 2009 1328 GMT

Living within one's means and being frugal have always been in style. Living in decadence and for appearence only have always been obscene. It should not take P.C. to choose the path, only common sense and common good which comes from within the heart. Leave the world a better place after our departure, be concerned about justice and fairness rather than narrow self worth.

pressord   April 18th, 2009 2104 GMT

Sadly one does what one is used to do and if no one else stop doing it things goes on and on, right? Fifteen years ago I was in the middle of the nineties crash and what I did learn was to hold back on everything worth of money and that was a new experience, I'd just bought a house for me and my family. Holy cow what a mess! That era ended around 2004-05 and then my economy was fairly stable and has been since and if the consumption of unnecessary items of any kind continues, people doesn't have a chance and thats the point. Buy only the right things and you will survive.

Have a nice evening!

James from London   April 19th, 2009 1932 GMT

Unfortunately i don't think consumption with a cause is here to stay. Many fair trade products are cheaper than their brand name equivalents. In this tough economic period people are happy to purchase the fair trade products because they are cheap, not becaause of the cause they contribute to.

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Hear from CNN reporters across the globe. "In the Field" is a unique blog that will let you share the thoughts and observations of CNN's award-winning international journalists from their far-flung bureaus or on assignment. Whether it's from conflict zone, a summit gathering, or the path least traveled, "In the Field" gives you a personal, front row seat to CNN's global newsgathering team.

Follow us on Twitter

Follow CNNInTheField on TwitterGet In The Field updates when they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.

Follow CNNInTheField

From our Partners
Categories
Powered by WordPress.com VIP