But now we have Iran subject and its showing the difference between the two candidates.

When you get 2 or more leading experts on the economy in the same room you get 2 or more expert opinions. Solving our economic issue is not a knee-jerk action and a president can ill afford to say exactly how, when, what will be done. A plan of priorities with monitoring and the capability of alteration is how Obama sees the crisis which is the only prudent option offered by both candidates.

Sheesh, if either committed to where they stand, they "MIGHT" actually be held accountable when elected....

Held Accountable by who....Wall Street Execs??

We should acknowledge both candidates contributions within the allowed 90 minutes of the debate. But Sen. Obama was better broaden and specific where necessary than Sen. McCain in the bid to respond who as a next America leader to fix current economic woes and restore America’s globally detoriated image and values.

Dr. Johnnel Olabhie

I am tired of hearing that we must lower coporate taxes so companies can hire people. Cut the taxes to large corporations and they will pay the executives even better.

Corporations need to cut executive salaries and pay who they have better and hire some more. The income tax system was developed to redistribute wealth to begin with–the rich were taking advantage of the poor. People can spend more and save more if they are paid better–empower the masses to save the economy.

This may seem utterly insipid and probably useless query, but what what if the chinese or russian government, countries who are financial sound, fill in the 700bill deficit that the US economy faces?
They then hold major, and crucially influential footings in US, and hence world economy. And atleast for a "developing" country like China, this can be view as a launch pad for serious growth.

What would Andrew Jackson say about the 700 Billion dollar bailout?

I was disappointed in the debate because of the lack of specific details from either man. Over all I believe Sen. Obama won the debate, he did not back down when Sen. McCain started to slam him and Sen. Obama stayed with a positive message. Sen. McCain has ran negative ads and has been a negaitive person through out the whole campaign much more than Sen. Obama, even the independent's think so. If you watched the bars at the bottom of the screen during the debate Sen. McCain was in the negative a lot more than Sen. Obama.

What ever the debate, what ever the date, Obama creamed, wipped McCains but/face. He should have given Obama the respect of at least looking at him. That was a real offence to be. It seamed asthough McCain was trying to say tha Obama dont mean nothing and is not worth the glance. But if he would have been man enough to just look into his face he would have seen that Obama was'nt Playing with Him. He kicked MCCains A** Foriegn & Domestic.