Edition: U.S. | Arabic | Set Pref
September 7, 2008
Posted: 1614 GMT

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan  — After my pre-election blog with metaphoric ruminations about gathering storm clouds, downpours, damped spirits and political battles, I wasn’t too surprised when the heavens did open halfway through voting. Fortunately I’d brought a rain jacket with me — but it did cross my mind that I’d rather tempted fate talking about the weather so close to the lawmakers casting their ballots.

 Asif Ali Zardari, Pakistan’s new president, faces some of the toughest challenges of any world leader.
Asif Ali Zardari, Pakistan’s new president, faces some of the toughest challenges of any world leader.

In the parliamentarians’ car park in front of the National Assembly building I counted about a dozen satellite trucks feeding live signals for Pakistan’s numerous independent local TV stations. Many of them were pumping out live pictures of the voting, interspersed with breaking news analysis of quotes between rival representatives of the three different candidates.

As we set up own portable live transmission facility I couldn’t help but reflect how far the tools of democracy have advanced here during the past decade. It took what amounted to a dictator to do it, but under the ousted president, military leader General Pervez Musharraf, the media in Pakistan multiplied.

When Musharraf took power in a bloodless coup nine years ago, his men only had to take control of PTV, the state broadcaster, to get the message out that Musharraf was the new boss.

Today, thanks to Musharraf’s enlightened approach, he’d need to take over a whole host of broadcasters if he wanted a repeat of his 1999 power grab. That’s not to say that he didn’t try to do just that and close many media outlets down during his waning months in office. But you get the point.

The country is now awash with unvarnished, if sometimes a little inaccurate, TV reporting it never had before. And the man many media organizations here had helped hound from office was the man who helped get them off the ground in the first place.

Strange maybe, but Musharraf more than earned his ticket to retirement by long overstaying the welcome he came to power with, abusing his authority with transparent but, nonetheless, undemocratic manipulations to keep control of the country.

But enough of Musharraf. Saturday was all about the new guy. A three-way race.

Asif Ali Zardari, the widower of slain former Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, began the day as favorite.

We spent the morning by the path parliamentarians were using to reach the National Assembly and vote. Every so often we stopped one or two of them to ask their opinions. No one bucked the trend. Zardari still seemed to be the man.

That’s not to say they we are fans of his. Many of the opposition candidates were particularly vocal on what they expected Zardari to do if he won the vote: hand power back to the National Assembly taken by Musharraf. They wanted, they told us, a president who is a father figure for the country, who can unify and not divide. In short they want him to shed his party affiliation as well as his power.

It was while we were by the path that the rain began, slow at first, then heavier and in bigger splashes that discolored the tarmac. After a quick wry smile about my previous blog, I decided that was the moment to go and watch the historic event unfold firsthand.

As I came through the door high in the press gallery overlooking the parliamentarians in their chairs below, it took me a moment to orientate myself to the pictures I’d seen on TV.

There was the prime minister way below me and the ballot box on the raised table in front of him and next the chairman of the electoral commission. It was as if one had entered the upper circle at a theatre, with the prime minister in the front row of the stalls and the electoral officer on the stage.

But no theater has such a sense of awe and power as soon as you step inside it. The people below are not actors: they carry their power, privileges and responsibilities home with them every day. I suppose there is a solemnity to it but I had a very real sense of history being made here.

You could say that’s foolish; after all, the deals to secure the votes were made days, weeks ago. But the men and women below me were turning their trust in those deals to ticks in a box. It’s a moment of faith for them — and I felt caught up in that moment.

In hushed whispers a Pakistani journalist next to me pointed to the female parliamentarians below and told me it was Musharraf who had done much for women during his rule. It was true to a degree but I couldn’t help wondering if a fear of what the next president might bring was at the root of his re-rationalization of history casting Musharraf as some paragon of democracy.

When I came out it was raining harder than ever and I was greeted by the news that a suicide car bomber had attacked a police checkpoint in northwestern Pakistan, killing and wounding dozens of people. The blast was so powerful stores near the checkpoint had collapsed, people were still stuck inside, and the storm clouds of the day before had been a portent.

A few hours later, when we saw on the local TV stations live pictures of a garden banquet for lawmakers hosted by the president elect Asif Ali Zardari, we called contacts for a last-minute invite. Not only were we invited but I was allowed one question in what I was to later find out was an exclusive one-on-one interview with the new president.

I couldn’t help myself. I asked three. Well, what else can a reporter do when you’re given first shot at a new president? He’d won as expected more than two-thirds of the vote. In one province of 164 lawmakers, none voted against him. Anyway I was chastised, hopefully tongue-in-cheek, by his very media-savvy press aide for my enthusiasm.

What struck me, as Zardari explained his victory as a significant step towards a fully democratic Pakistan, was how he framed it as a tribute to the aspirations of Benazir Bhutto, his late wife and former prime minister.

It made me realize how hard it will be for him if he is to divorce himself from party politics. When Bhutto was assassinated, Zardari took over leadership of the party because he was judged as the best person to stop it from breaking apart. I’m not sure his party believes that he’s any less necessary to unity than before.

On the issue of handing back powers to the parliament taken by Musharraf, Zardari said he was committed to it, adding: “I shall hand over all the powers the parliament desires.”

A few minutes later the prime minister, Yousaf Raza Gilani, told me working out the details would be easy because both men are both from the same party.

As we drove back from the opulence of banquet, I was struck by the emptiness of the streets. It was around 10pm and apart from a few police we saw no one.

When the results were announced a few hours earlier, small noisy crowds had gathered outside the National Assembly. I’ve seen these types of crowds before. If you ignore them they go away, but point a camera in their direction and they animate and energize as if a switch were flipped. Even these stalwarts of political celebration had gone.

Strange. One would think there was something to celebrate. The election was the first fully democratic vote in over a decade, and Zardari had successfully built a political consensus and engineered Musharraf’s removal without bloodshed. No easy task. But no one we could find was dancing in the streets.

Was it because he is still tarnished in popular perception with charges, he refutes, of corruption? Or because he refuses to reinstate the Chief Justice sacked by Musharraf that many here feel is a test of his commitment to democracy? Or because people have no faith in any of their politicians?

To be successful Zardari will have to win over the people. His and the country’s battles ahead are numerous and complex. Tackling the tanking economy and take on the Taliban will both require popular and informed consent.

From what I have learned from my Pakistani journalist friends, Zardari has a short window of opportunity now to get the increasingly influential media in his corner or face their relentless scrutiny of any perceived failings.

He has a tough job ahead.

Posted by: ,
Filed under: General • Pakistan • Politics


Share this on:
Z. Hafeez   September 7th, 2008 1939 GMT

Nic is very generous with his criticism of the guy out of power — Musharraf — and muted in his criticism of the newly “elected” president Zardari, who has been chosen by a cabal of corrupt politicians rumored to have been influenced in their voting by money and promises of position within the new government. By allowing CNN access to the first one-on-one interview, Zardari successfully achieved another buy out with Nic Robertson. Pakistan with Zardari isn’t a better democracy, Nic, any way you look at it. Five months of his party’s disastrous rule have plummeted the rupee and exhausted the foreign exchange reserves of Pakistan. The “details” Yousaf Raza Gilani and Zardari now have to work out are concerned with how to loot and plunder what’s left of the remains.

Subhan Jamil   September 8th, 2008 315 GMT

Probably the biggest challenge for the world. I believe Asif Zardari holds the key to world war 3, if he can control his country he can be the reason for peace in the middle east. He an persist the Taliban, and control them. Hopefully Obama wouldn’t get cluttered and start entering Pakistan’s border as it can start a world war.

sudheermopperthy   September 8th, 2008 815 GMT

Nic Robertson,
The New President of Paksitan Asif Ali Zardari with the judicial charges and political battles spent 11 years in jail and had no bearing on today’s presidential election, and an amnesty last year cleared him of remaining charges. Zardari’s life journey has taken him from playboy to villain to political heir of the revered Bhutto, whose image still casts a shadow over daily life here nine months after her assassination. Zardari’s colourful past, however, could prove difficult for Pakistan.
Zardari becomes one of the most powerful civilian leaders in Pakistan’s 61-year history. It remains unclear what stand he will take on lot of hot topics of Pakistan including Taliban. US is keen and watching all the developments very very closely.
i agree he has a tough job but not only within the country but also from the external factors. lets wait and watch .

Ateeq   September 8th, 2008 1016 GMT

Best of Luck to Pakistan under rule of Zardari…. :) You must be tough on new team in terms of criticism to get better out of them…

Emran   September 8th, 2008 1405 GMT

Why, oh why isn’t any of the so called commentators prepared to accept politics for what it is? Decades of corrupt military rule has conditioned and brain washed people of some intelligence into condemning anything that politicians do. Zardari has been elected by the people’s representatives, so why keep on harping on his alleged and unproven corruption that the miltary and Nawaz Sharif successfully engineered into public consiousness. Only the Punjab prefers Sharif while the rest of the three provinces have overwhelmingly voted Zardari in. The Punjab needs to accept reality and learn to live without power until they produce leadership of the quality that can give them their stranglehold on the country.

Although I do not agree with a whole lot of Zardari’s politics I am glad the rest of Pakistan has allowed him to win the Presidency and the other losers can now shut up and await their turn. Thank you, Nic for being objective because a particular class of Pakistanis can take a lesson from it and stop being emotionally and politically retarded.

Z. Hafeez   September 8th, 2008 2346 GMT

The notion that feudal-controlled Pakistan has ever had true elections in the last few decades resulting in “people’s representatives” is a fallacy. Voter suppression and oppression are very real threats in Pakistani villages where landowners coerce peasants into voting for a certain outcome. Until Pakistan has proper land reforms, like India did in the late 1940s under the excellent guidance of Nehru, Pakistan will never be a true democracy as we understand it in the West. Oppressive living conditions in rural Pakistan and lack of education have favored the same old illiterate and morally corrupt landowners to be ushered into power. These so-called people’s representatives have then gone on to back demented crooks like Zardari to become president. Read the British press — the Financial Times, Guardian and Independent for better coverage of events in Pakistan.

Jami   September 9th, 2008 921 GMT

Nic always covers sensitive areas.Watch Nic and you will find something big is going to happen in that area. Dont you remember Nic in Afghanistan before U.S interference and Nic in Iraq when U.S began prepration for upheavel in Iraq. Now in Pakistan????????
The present power structure in pakistan is carefully planned in U.S
and U.S shall look for action by these guys in power. Democracy in Pakistan? is a joke.
Courrpt regimes geting power with the blessings of outside masters, ready to obey.
The nation which cannot dispense justice to its chief justice ,will have many news in near future for which Nic is already there to report.

Zeeshan Haider   September 9th, 2008 1652 GMT

We, as a Pakistani are facing a lot of challanges currently at every level and almost all parts of the country. but i am hopeful that we will overcome these issues very soon. PPP under the supervision of Zardari sb has been given another chance or i should say a responsibility to help the pakistani people to overcome these challanges. I am sure that we as a nation have this ability to come out of thses crisis but it needs a collective effort from all the political parties mainly PML (N) led by charismatic Mian sb/ ANP/MQM………

Salman   September 10th, 2008 824 GMT

How can a person with a middle school education and NO legal or parliamentary experience become the ruler of a nuclear power?

This is one of the WORST things to happen to Pakistan and proves the REAL intentions of the “elected parliamentarians”. They chose to elect a president that will let them go about their business of looting the country … you scratch my back and I’ll scratch yours.

Raja Khan   September 13th, 2008 314 GMT

Its same old story big them up use them and then say how bad there were.USA likes to create and destroy look at history all the time same and the world just sets back and blames others when its USA double standards thats is the problem!!!!!!

Pakistan has no leaders that think pakistan first only pocket first and friends so no change same old thing.If we all want peace then we old need to be fair to all.

salman sheikh   September 21st, 2008 057 GMT

Pakistan has a lot of problems ahead. The solution one feels has to come from a minority. Yes, i am referring to the educated class of Pakistan. It is time that the educated class of Pakistan understand what is that they want this state to become. Personally i am someone who has always been a strong supporter of the concept of democracy. Today, finally, we have acheived that feat. How much of the credit should go to the Ex-president, the lawers, or the media is now a thing of the past. We have bigger problems in the present and the upcoming future.

I am writing from islamabad. Today a bomb blasted at the only five star hotel placed at one of the safest places of this city. The explosion was so intense that my house, which is about 8 kms away completely shook. The entire city was horrified and felt “TERROR.”

The point I am trying to make is that weather or not we support the president,(personally i do not) this is the time to stand behind an electred representative and raise our voices. That goes for all insitutions.

One also hopes, that international champions of democracies(like the US and UK) understand the delicate situation this new government is going through, and gives them the time and space (BY atleast not attacking in the region without warning) required to get the important institutions behind then, and negotiate a manner in which these senseless terrorists are supposed to be dealt with.

Salman Sheikh

baldtree   September 23rd, 2008 1202 GMT

It is obvious that neither the new President nor the PM are in control of Pakistan. It is just a matter of time when the Military will have to step in again, perhaps after a year or less. Meanwhile, Zardari has to immeditely reconsider his war in the Tribal areas. Imran Khan is right, it is only driving the tribals away and antoganising them. It must stop to avoid further bloodshed of the innocent.

However, it is also an opportunity for the civilian govt to clip the wings of the military by reducing their budget by half . It is necessary to reduce the army and save money. Food for thought.

Leave Your Comment


 

Comments are moderated by CNN, in accordance with the CNN Comment Policy, and may not appear on this blog until they have been reviewed and deemed appropriate for posting. Also, due to the volume of comments we receive, not all comments will be posted.


subscribe RSS Icon
About this blog

Hear from CNN reporters across the globe. "In the Field" is a unique blog that will let you share the thoughts and observations of CNN's award-winning international journalists from their far-flung bureaus or on assignment. Whether it's from conflict zone, a summit gathering, or the path least traveled, "In the Field" gives you a personal, front row seat to CNN's global newsgathering team.

Follow us on Twitter

Follow CNNInTheField on TwitterGet In The Field updates when they appear online via the Web, SMS, or instant messages.

Follow CNNInTheField

From our Partners
Categories
CNN Comment Policy: CNN encourages you to add a comment to this discussion. You may not post any unlawful, threatening, defamatory, obscene, pornographic or other material that would violate the law. All comments should be relevant to the topic and remain respectful of other authors and commenters. You are solely responsible for your own comments, the consequences of posting those comments, and the consequences of any reliance by you on the comments of others. By submitting your comment, you hereby give CNN the right, but not the obligation, to post, air, edit, exhibit, telecast, cablecast, webcast, re-use, publish, reproduce, use, license, print, distribute or otherwise use your comment(s) and accompanying personal identifying and other information you provide via all forms of media now known or hereafter devised, worldwide, in perpetuity. CNN Privacy Statement.
Home  |  Asia  |  Europe  |  U.S.  |  World  |  World Business  |  Technology  |  Entertainment  |  World Sport  |  Travel
Podcasts  |  Blogs  |  CNN Mobile  |  RSS Feeds  |  Email Alerts  |  CNN Radio  |  Site Map
CNN en Espaňol  |  Arabic  |  Japanese  |  Korean  |  Turkish
CNN U.S.  |  CNN TV  |  CNN International  |  HLN  |  Transcripts
© 2009 Cable News Network. A Time Warner Company. All Rights Reserved.
Powered by WordPress.com VIP